which manuel is better ?

[3Dwheeler]

is the Haynes manuel is better then the Cylmers??:wondering

[nouseforaname90]

I don't know.. I've never heard of a Haynes manual, but everyone always suggests getting a Clymers, so I'm going to have to guess that the Clymers is better.. or atleast more popular.

[Huffa]

Quite honestly I never liked neither. Worth the extra bucks to get a true factory manual.

What do you need it for in reguards to year make and model?

Maybe we can help you out in getting a "good" manual! :beer

Well I guess for the most part either one is OK, that your asking about, I just found that sometimes a procedure is expalined better in the true factory manual.

[Rm250RF900R]

Yeah I always find mistakes in those clymer manuals.

[Vealmonkey]

I've always preferred the honda manuals. I find that the other manuals are too general and try to cover too many years.

[Enigma]

I have a clymer manual for my 85 R, and Im not a fan of it. The one I have covers 85-86 R's and the 250 quads up to 87 or 88. There is just too much stuff to sort through. I have factory Kawa manuals for my tecates and I like them alot. I have never heard of Haynes so I can't say anything about them.

[3Dwheeler]

Thank you all for the replys. Mr Huffa My reason for asking was that my pull start did not go back in so i took it apart. lol no i not sure i can put it back to gether. I went to the local honda dealer to get the print out of the assembly. I told the kid (1/2) the age of my honda for the diagram for a 1982 200 he told me in 82 they only made the 200E witch i know is fauls. but any way... the printout looks close but not close enough. I noticed you are also parting out a 200 do you have pics of it and what parts are left?
:beer

[3Dwheeler]

cool site thank you. I did not know about it.

Still not sure how to put the spring back in any ideals?